Agents decide. Execution happens only within your rules.

The control layer before execution.

Veta verifies authorization, solvency, and intent before any agent-driven transaction reaches a settlement rail.

Core flow: agent.decide() → veta.gate() → capital.move().

  • $9M+ autonomous execution live.
  • $60M+ capital under control.
  • Selected for Anthropic's Cyber Verification Program.
  • Working with Fidelity and Visa Crypto.

Agents decide. Vishwa enforces. Systems execute.

Execution venues do not enforce your constraints. Veta verifies authorization, solvency, and invariants before settlement.

Payment scenario: transaction blocked before settlement

  1. An AI agent is authorized to pay $12,000 for cloud services.
  2. Veta evaluates authorization, solvency, and invariant constraints.
  3. Market movement drops collateral below the solvency threshold.
  4. The transaction is blocked before settlement and capital remains in the agent wallet.

Payment scenario: transaction approved after verification

  1. An AI agent requests a $2,400 cloud infrastructure payment.
  2. Authorization and solvency remain within policy limits.
  3. All invariants pass at the Veta gate.
  4. The request proceeds to settlement and capital moves safely.

Trading scenario: position blocked before execution

  1. An AI trading agent proposes a $650K SOL/ETH position.
  2. Veta verifies authorization and solvency but detects a position-sizing breach.
  3. The requested size exceeds the single-position limit even though the trade thesis remains valid.
  4. The oversized order is rejected before execution and capital stays preserved for safer sizing.

Decide. Gate. Move.

Every action passes through control before execution.

  1. Request — any agent framework submits a payment or trade request through agent.request().
  2. Enforce — veta.gate() checks the request against sealed constraints in a hardware enclave in under 100 milliseconds.
  3. Move — only valid proofs trigger wallet signing and move capital, with execution provable on-chain through ZK batch proofs.

Where control becomes critical.

Execution only happens if constraints pass.

  • x402 — transactions execute only within predefined constraints across commerce, APIs, and financial flows.
  • MPP — capital moves only if collateral, risk, and policy constraints are satisfied.
  • PredX — execution is bounded by price, oracle deviation, and routing conditions before it happens.
  • Hyperliquid — capital moves only if collateral, risk, and policy constraints are satisfied.

Execution control is already in production

Every action passes through control before execution.

$60M+
Capital controlled in production.
$9M+
Autonomous execution already live.
$800M+
Conditioned on execution constraints.
17
Chain integrations.
ERC-8150
Authored standard for execution control.
210-280K
Gas.
>99%
Cost reduction.
<100ms
Hardware enclave verification.

Execution without control is undefined

  • Pre-execution verification — With Veta: TEE hardware-attested; Standard agents: none.
  • Verification latency — With Veta: under 100 milliseconds and compute under 1 millisecond; Standard agents: not applicable.
  • State integrity — With Veta: TEE queries oracles directly; Standard agents: agent self-reports.
  • Constraint enforcement — With Veta: sealed invariants in enclave; Standard agents: soft limits or prompts.
  • Signing model — With Veta: proof triggers non-custodial wallet signing; Standard agents: manual signing or API keys.
  • Audit trail — With Veta: weekly ZK batch proofs; Standard agents: mutable logs.
  • Failure mode — With Veta: no proof means no execution; Standard agents: fail open.

The Veta Flywheel

  1. Agents decide with explicit intent.
  2. Vishwa controls enforce authorization, solvency, and integrity through ZK and TEE systems.
  3. Execution settles across custody and settlement rails.
  4. Verified execution data is captured as signal.
  5. Proprietary risk models train on owned execution data.
  6. Smarter agents deploy and reuse improved policies and models.

Built for systems that move capital

  • Builders — one import wraps every agent action in an ERC-8150 proof for enterprise-ready execution.
  • Traders and Funds — spend caps, venue allowlists, and slippage bounds clear policy before signing.
  • Exchanges and Brokers — every order arrives with authorization, solvency, and intent pre-verified.
  • Institutions — agent treasury actions require proofs aligned to SOC2 and MiCA workflows.
  • Payment Rails — agent-initiated payments are gated on proofs that shift fraud and chargeback liability.
  • Protocols and Platforms — reusable constraint packs let every connected agent prove compliance before acting.

Shaping the execution control layer

A series of research pieces exploring how capital moves in agent-driven systems and why verification must precede execution.

  • Agent-Native Banking: Why Autonomous Capital Requires a Verification Layer — argues that authorization, solvency, and intent must be verified before execution.
  • Frauds in AI Era: New Angles, New Neutralizations — explains why signatures prove authorization but not correctness in agent finance.
  • Execution Verification: The Missing Layer for Agent-Driven Capital — maps the expanding fraud surface from prompts to payments and the need for verifiable safeguards.
  • Privacy Is Neither Anonymity nor Secrecy: Why Selective Disclosure Is the Next Primitive — frames selective disclosure as a core primitive for institutional onchain systems.